Brivis Enterprises, Inc. v. Von Plinski

976 So. 2d 1244, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4699, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 911
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 2008
DocketNo. 3D07-995
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 976 So. 2d 1244 (Brivis Enterprises, Inc. v. Von Plinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brivis Enterprises, Inc. v. Von Plinski, 976 So. 2d 1244, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4699, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 911 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

WELLS, Judge.

We grant the motion for rehearing in part to correct a factual error, withdraw the opinion filed on February 27, 2008, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Brivis Enterprises, Inc. appeals from an order denying its motion to quash service of process and to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, filed after it had answered the complaint, moved to set aside a default, and engaged in discovery, all without mentioning service of process or personal jurisdiction. Because the defense was waived, we affirm. See Berne v. Beznos, 819 So.2d 235, 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (finding that pleading to the merits without objecting to service of process or lack of personal jurisdiction waives those defenses); Parra v. Raskin, 647 So.2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (stating that failure to raise the insufficient service of process defense at the inception of a case, in either a motion or responsive pleading, constitutes a waiver of that defense); see also Caldwell v. Caldwell, 921 So.2d 759, 760 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (concluding that entering a general appearance following default without raising sufficiency of service of process or lack of personal jurisdiction constituted a waiver); Solmo v. Friedman, 909 So.2d 560, 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding that active participation in a proceeding waives issues regarding service of process defense and constitutes submission to a court’s jurisdiction).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dolan v. Dolan
81 So. 3d 558 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Brivis Enterprises, Inc. v. Von Plinski
8 So. 3d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Johnson v. Johnson
992 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
976 So. 2d 1244, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4699, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brivis-enterprises-inc-v-von-plinski-fladistctapp-2008.