Britton v. State

595 So. 2d 583, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3307, 1992 WL 57871
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1992·No. No. 91-00107·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On a revocation of probation the trial judge in sentencing appellant departed upward more than one cell based on appellant having had multiple violations of probation in this case. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court has held that multiple violations of probation is not a proper reason for a guidelines departure. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992). Williams also held, however, that “where there are multiple violations of probation, the sentence may be successively bumped to one higher cell for each violation.” Therefore, the sentence in this case is set aside and the cause remanded for resentencing consistent with Williams.

Reversed in part.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Britton v. State, 595 So. 2d 583, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3307, 1992 WL 57871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 583 (Britton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alfonso v. State
595 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)