Britton v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Britton v. State

861 S.W.2d 114, 314 Ark. 220, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 488

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedSeptember 20, 1993

DocketCR 93-832

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 861 S.W.2d 114 (Britton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Britton v. State, 861 S.W.2d 114, 314 Ark. 220, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 488 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Billy J. Britton, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Billy J. Britton will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Billy J. Britton, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Billy J. Britton will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 S.W.2d 114, 314 Ark. 220, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britton-v-state-ark-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack