Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

D. Oregon

Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided November 14, 2024·No. 6:21-cv-00971·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DANA M. BRITTON, Case No. 6:21-cv-00971-JR Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES vs. PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

Plaintiff Dana M. Britton brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The Court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings. The Commissioner subsequently found Plaintiff entitled to Social Security benefits beginning June 2017. Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). I have reviewed the record in this case, the motion, and the supporting materials, including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of counsel’s hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002), the Court finds that the requested fees are reasonable. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded $15,803.00 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), representing the difference between the full § 406(b) amount requested ($25,563.00) and the

amount of EAJA fee counsel previously received ($9,760.00). In accordance with agency policy, the Commissioner is instructed to make a direct payment of the award of $15,803.00, less any applicable processing or user fees prescribed by statute, to Plaintiff’s attorney, Brent Wells, at WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C., from benefits the Social Security Administration has withheld from Plaintiff’s past due benefits. Any amount withheld after all administrative and court attorney fees are paid should be released to the claimant.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2024.

_/_s_/ _Jo_l_i_e _A_._ R__u_s_so_____________________ Jolie A. Russo United States Magistrate Judge Proposed Order submitted by: Brent Wells WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C. 474 Willamette Street Eugene, OR 97401 (541)686-1969 bwells@wmetattorneys.com Of Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DANA M. BRITTON, Case No. 6:21-cv-00971-JR Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES vs. PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

Plaintiff Dana M. Britton brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The Court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings. The Commissioner subsequently found Plaintiff entitled to Social Security benefits beginning June 2017. Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). I have reviewed the record in this case, the motion, and the supporting materials, including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of counsel’s hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002), the Court finds that the requested fees are reasonable. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded $15,803.00 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), representing the difference between the full § 406(b) amount requested ($25,563.00) and the

amount of EAJA fee counsel previously received ($9,760.00). In accordance with agency policy, the Commissioner is instructed to make a direct payment of the award of $15,803.00, less any applicable processing or user fees prescribed by statute, to Plaintiff’s attorney, Brent Wells, at WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C., from benefits the Social Security Administration has withheld from Plaintiff’s past due benefits. Any amount withheld after all administrative and court attorney fees are paid should be released to the claimant.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2024.

_/_s_/ _Jo_l_i_e _A_._ R__u_s_so_____________________ Jolie A. Russo United States Magistrate Judge Proposed Order submitted by: Brent Wells WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C. 474 Willamette Street Eugene, OR 97401 (541)686-1969 bwells@wmetattorneys.com Of Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2024).

Pincite

Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related