Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided April 2, 2020·No. 6:19-cv-00007-YY·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON STEVEN CHARLES BRITTON, Case No. 6:19-cv-00007-YY

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA vs. COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $6,797.65 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be via check made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorneys at HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010), the award shall be made payable to Katherine Eitenmiller, HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government through the federal treasury offset program. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein. 2nd April Dated this _____ day of ____________ 2020. ____/s_/_ Y__o_u_le_e_ _Y_i_m_ _Y_o_u_ ___________________ YOULEE YIM YOU United States Magistrate Judge Proposed Order submitted by: Katherine L. Eitenmiller HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, OR 97401 (541)686-1969

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2020).

Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Britton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)