Britten v. State

53 S.E. 99, 124 Ga. 783, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 613
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 53 S.E. 99 (Britten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Britten v. State, 53 S.E. 99, 124 Ga. 783, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 613 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Beck, J.

1, It has been repeatedly ruled by this court that an attack upon the charge of a court by culling therefrom isolated clauses and sentences, which, if taken alone, would be erroneous, will not be entertained when, immediately preceding or following such objectionable extracts, they are so qualified by the language of the court as to correctly state the law of the case.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New England Mutual Life Insurance v. Childs
194 S.E. 561 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Georgia Power Co. v. Jones
188 S.E. 566 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Neville v. National Life & Accident Insurance
135 S.E. 315 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Payne v. Allen
110 S.E. 345 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Deas
96 S.E. 267 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 S.E. 99, 124 Ga. 783, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britten-v-state-ga-1906.