Britten v. State
This text of 53 S.E. 99 (Britten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1, It has been repeatedly ruled by this court that an attack upon the charge of a court by culling therefrom isolated clauses and sentences, which, if taken alone, would be erroneous, will not be entertained when, immediately preceding or following such objectionable extracts, they are so qualified by the language of the court as to correctly state the law of the case.
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 S.E. 99, 124 Ga. 783, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britten-v-state-ga-1906.