Brittany Morrow v. Barry Balaski

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brittany Morrow v. Barry Balaski. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 F.3d 160
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 12, 2012·No. 11-2000·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 11-2000

BRITTANY MORROW;

EMILY MORROW, Minors, In Their Own Right, And By Their Parents and Natural Guardians, Breadley Morrow and Diedre Morrow;

BRADLEY MORROW;

DIEDRE MORROW, Individually, Appellants

v.

BARRY BALASKI, Individually; THE BLACKHAWK SCHOOL DISTRICT

PRESENT: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, and NYGAARD 1, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The Court, sua sponte, orders rehearing en banc in the above captioned case.

It is ordered that the Clerk of this Court list the case for rehearing en banc

at the convenience of the Court.

By the Court,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee Chief Judge

Date: July 12, 2012 tmk/cc: Charles W. Craven, Esq.

Albert A. Torrence, Esq.

1 Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brittany Morrow v. Barry Balaski, (3d Cir. 2012).

Brittany Morrow v. Barry Balaski (Brittany Morrow v. Barry Balaski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.