Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 2, 2023
Docket23-1560
StatusUnpublished

This text of Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford (Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1560 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1560

BRITTANY FLUTE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KRISTI JOHNSON-FORD, HR Manager; ADRIENE SCHIFRIEN, MLS Manager; KAREN BRESSLER, Client Service Supervisor; MELVIN CAUTHEN, Manager III, STD, HIV Services; KIMBERLY TOWNSEND, Head of Dennis AVE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (8:22-cv-03344-DLB)

Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brittany Flute, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1560 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Brittany Flute seeks to appeal the district court’s February 24, 2023, order

dismissing without prejudice her employment discrimination complaint for failure to

comply with the court’s prior order directing her to amend the complaint. However, after

Flute noted her appeal, the district court reopened her case and expressly rescinded its

February 24 order. The court subsequently entered a final order, but Flute did not file a

new notice of appeal. As such, there is no district court order presently before this court

for review. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United

States v. Doe, 962 F.3d 139, 143 (4th Cir. 2020) (noting that “we have jurisdiction only

over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders”). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John Doe
962 F.3d 139 (Fourth Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brittany-flute-v-kristi-johnson-ford-ca4-2023.