Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford
This text of Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford (Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1560 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1560
BRITTANY FLUTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KRISTI JOHNSON-FORD, HR Manager; ADRIENE SCHIFRIEN, MLS Manager; KAREN BRESSLER, Client Service Supervisor; MELVIN CAUTHEN, Manager III, STD, HIV Services; KIMBERLY TOWNSEND, Head of Dennis AVE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (8:22-cv-03344-DLB)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brittany Flute, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1560 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Brittany Flute seeks to appeal the district court’s February 24, 2023, order
dismissing without prejudice her employment discrimination complaint for failure to
comply with the court’s prior order directing her to amend the complaint. However, after
Flute noted her appeal, the district court reopened her case and expressly rescinded its
February 24 order. The court subsequently entered a final order, but Flute did not file a
new notice of appeal. As such, there is no district court order presently before this court
for review. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United
States v. Doe, 962 F.3d 139, 143 (4th Cir. 2020) (noting that “we have jurisdiction only
over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders”). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brittany Flute v. Kristi Johnson-Ford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brittany-flute-v-kristi-johnson-ford-ca4-2023.