Brittany Aiken v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-508-CR
BRITTANY AIKEN APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ----------
We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” Although
appellant has not signed the motion in compliance with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of
appellate procedure, appellant indicated in writing in a letter received in this court
on April 12, 2012, that she no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.2(a). We suspend rule 42.2(a)’s requirement that appellant sign the
motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex. R. App. P. 2. No decision of this
court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion
and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: April 26, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brittany Aiken v. State (Brittany Aiken v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.