Brittany Aiken v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 26, 2012·No. 02-11-00508-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-508-CR

BRITTANY AIKEN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” Although

appellant has not signed the motion in compliance with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of

appellate procedure, appellant indicated in writing in a letter received in this court

on April 12, 2012, that she no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). We suspend rule 42.2(a)’s requirement that appellant sign the

motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex. R. App. P. 2. No decision of this

court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 26, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brittany Aiken v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Brittany Aiken v. State (Brittany Aiken v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.