Britt v. Woolf

121 So. 457, 23 Ala. App. 108, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 99
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 1929·No. 2 Div. 407.·Published

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

This cause is submitted on motion of appellee to strike the bill of exceptions and to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The bill of exception is nothing more than the stenographic report of the trial and *109 is in flagrant: violation of circuit rule 32. The motion to strike the bill of exceptions is granted. Lucas v. Mays, 2 Ala. App. 497, 56 So. 593; Cole v. State, 4 Ala. App. 673, 59 So. 235; Turner v. Thornton, 192 Ala. 98, 68 So. 813.

No brief of attorneys -for appellant was presented to this court on submission, and, being called on the motion day of the call of the second division, motion is made to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Bill of exceptions stricken, and appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Britt v. Woolf, 121 So. 457, 23 Ala. App. 108, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 99 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

121 So. 457 (Britt v. Woolf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas v. Mays
56 So. 593 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Cole v. State
59 So. 235 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Turner v. Thornton
68 So. 813 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)