Britt v. Van Orden
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 99, 1 Cole. Cas. 96
This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 99 (Britt v. Van Orden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Britt v. Van Orden, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 99, 1 Cole. Cas. 96 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
This was an irregularity in practice not to be countenanced. Let the plaintiff take the effect of his motion, with costs to be paid by the defendant’s attorney himself.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 99, 1 Cole. Cas. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-van-orden-nysupct-1800.