Britt v. State
137 S.E. 791, 36 Ga. App. 668, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 235
Opinion
The indictment contained two counts, the first count charging that the accused sold intoxicating liquors on the eighth day of August, 1926, and the second count that on the same day he controlled and possessed intoxicating liquors; and the same evidence was relied on to convict under both counts. The verdict found the accused guilty on the first count and not guilty on the second count, ffeld: The verdict was void for repugnancy, and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. Kuck v. State, 149 Ga. 191 (99 S. E. 622).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Britt v. State, 137 S.E. 791, 36 Ga. App. 668, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
137 S.E. 791 (Britt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. Waters
598 S.E.2d 476 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Burns v. State
195 S.E.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Ansley v. State
185 S.E.2d 562 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Holder v. State
78 S.E.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Cannon v. State
32 S.E.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Owen v. White
185 S.E. 97 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Davis v. State
157 S.E. 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Smith v. State
143 S.E. 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)