Britt v. State
37 S.E. 886, 112 Ga. 583, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 15
This text of 37 S.E. 886 (Britt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Britt v. State, 37 S.E. 886, 112 Ga. 583, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 15 (Ga. 1901).
Opinion
1. The exercise of due diligence on the part of the accused and his counsel would have enabled them to discover before the jury was empanelled that two of the jurors selected to try the case were members of the grand jury that found the bill. See Jones v. State, 95 Ga. 497.
2. The evidence fully warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rogers v. State
156 S.E. 323 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Cason v. State
99 S.E. 61 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
James v. State
98 S.E. 737 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Wilcox v. State
90 S.E. 1032 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Cargill v. State
77 S.E. 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 886, 112 Ga. 583, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-state-ga-1901.