Britt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Britt v. State

200 So. 3d 801, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15054, 2016 WL 5874425

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 7, 2016

DocketNo. 1D15-2827

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 3d 801 (Britt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Britt v. State, 200 So. 3d 801, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15054, 2016 WL 5874425 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing on Counts I and II in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla.2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible but not mandatory where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing on Counts I and II in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla.2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible but not mandatory where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 3d 801, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15054, 2016 WL 5874425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack