Britt v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Britt v. State

942 S.W.2d 251, 328 Ark. 141, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 226

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 14, 1997

DocketCR 97-200

StatusPublished

This text of 942 S.W.2d 251 (Britt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Britt v. State, 942 S.W.2d 251, 328 Ark. 141, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 226 (Ark. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Ronald C. Wilson, attorney for appellant, Antonio Britt, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, stating that it would be in the best interest of all concerned.

The motion further states that another attorney, Don Forrest, has expressed an interest in handling the case. However, as of this date, no motion to appoint substitute counsel has been filed on behalf of appellant.

The motion is, therefore, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Ronald C. Wilson, attorney for appellant, Antonio Britt, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, stating that it would be in the best interest of all concerned.

The motion further states that another attorney, Don Forrest, has expressed an interest in handling the case. However, as of this date, no motion to appoint substitute counsel has been filed on behalf of appellant.

The motion is, therefore, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

942 S.W.2d 251, 328 Ark. 141, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-state-ark-1997.