Britt v. Raymes

Fourth Circuit

Britt v. Raymes

538 F. App'x 343

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 27, 2013

DocketNo. 13-6528

StatusPublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 343 (Britt v. Raymes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Britt v. Raymes, 538 F. App'x 343 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Clyde Britt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Britt v. Raymes, No. 5:07-ct-03140-BO, 2013 WL 1091047 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Clyde Britt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Britt v. Raymes, No. 5:07-ct-03140-BO, 2013 WL 1091047 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 F. App'x 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-raymes-ca4-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack