Britt v. Raymes

Fourth Circuit

Britt v. Raymes

538 F. App'x 343

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2013·No. No. 13-6528·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Clyde Britt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Britt v. Raymes, No. 5:07-ct-03140-BO, 2013 WL 1091047 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Clyde Britt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Britt v. Raymes, No. 5:07-ct-03140-BO, 2013 WL 1091047 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Britt v. Raymes, 538 F. App'x 343 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

538 F. App'x 343 (Britt v. Raymes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related