Britt v. Howard
Opinion
A bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge, and he refused to sign it, and returned it, within ten days, to the movant’s counsel, with his written objections, pointing out therein, among other things, that the bill of exceptions contained material statements of fact which were not true. It not appearing that the objections specified by the judge were met and removed, this court will not require him to sign the bill of exceptions. Civil Code (1910), § 6158; Campbell v. Foute, 6 Ga. App. 113 (64 S. E. 292); Covin v. Willie, 19 Ga. App. 259 (91 S. E. 278), and citations.
Mandamus nisi denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
101 S.E. 768 (Britt v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.