Britt v. Hays

21 Ga. 157
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1857
DocketNo. 29
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 21 Ga. 157 (Britt v. Hays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Britt v. Hays, 21 Ga. 157 (Ga. 1857).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

The plaintiff treatiug the special contract in this case, as fescindedby the misconduct of the defendant, which he bad a light to do, Rogers vs. Parham 8 Ga. Rep. 190; sued on a quantvim meruit for work aud labor actually performed-He was rectus in curia. His writ or complaint needed no amendment; but he was entitled to recover upon it as it stood, provided he could sustain it by satisfactory proof; and that he was not permitted to do. It was allowable to refer to the special contract to fix the measure of damages; or in other words to prove the value of the plaintiff’s services; as estimated by the defendant himself. He offered to do this however by independent testimony, and the proof was rejected.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenstock v. Congregation Agudath Achim
164 S.E.2d 283 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Brand v. Ogden-Howard Co.
111 A. 370 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1920)
Cason v. Tye
9 Ga. App. 325 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Jackson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
69 S.E. 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Beck v. Thompson & Taylor Spice Co.
33 S.E. 894 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
In re Sawyer
31 Abb. N. Cas. 342 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ga. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-hays-ga-1857.