Britt v. Case

Supreme Court of Iowa

Britt v. Case

12 N.W. 624, 58 Iowa 757

DecidedJune 10, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.W. 624 (Britt v. Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Britt v. Case, 12 N.W. 624, 58 Iowa 757 (iowa 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Sebvbrs, Ch. J.

No errors axe assigned. The case is, therefore, triable anew. The abstract states: “The testimony was all taken in writing, in substance as follows:” There is no statement other than this tending to show that all the evidence offered and introduced on the trial in the District Court is contained in the abstract. This being so, we cannot reverse or modify the judgment of the District Court. Andrews v. Kerr et al., 49 Iowa, 680; Endersby v. Endersby, Id., 694; Taylor & Co. v. Kier et al., 54 Id., 645.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sebvbrs, Ch. J.

No errors axe assigned. The case is, therefore, triable anew. The abstract states: “The testimony was all taken in writing, in substance as follows:” There is no statement other than this tending to show that all the evidence offered and introduced on the trial in the District Court is contained in the abstract. This being so, we cannot reverse or modify the judgment of the District Court. Andrews v. Kerr et al., 49 Iowa, 680; Endersby v. Endersby, Id., 694; Taylor & Co. v. Kier et al., 54 Id., 645.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 N.W. 624, 58 Iowa 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-case-iowa-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack