Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority

63 A.D.3d 1593, 879 N.Y.S.2d 764
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 5, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 63 A.D.3d 1593 (Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, 63 A.D.3d 1593, 879 N.Y.S.2d 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered April 11, 2008. The order, inter alia, granted a stay of the action pending resolution of a related federal action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the alternative relief sought by defendants in their respective CPLR 3211 (a) (4) motions, i.e., to stay the action pending the outcome of a related federal action (see CPLR 2201; see generally Asher v Abbott Labs., 307 AD2d 211 [2003]). A stay may be warranted based on “due consideration of issues of comity, orderly procedure, and judicial economy” where there is substantial identity of the issues, relief sought, and parties in the state and federal actions (id. at 211; see Finger Lakes Racing Assn. v New York Racing Assn., 28 AD3d 1208, 1209 [2006]), and that is the case here. Plaintiffs contention that the case should be assigned to a different justice based on the court’s al[1594]*1594leged bias is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not preserved for our review (see William Kaufman Org. v Graham & James, 269 AD2d 171,174 [2000]; Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985 [1994]). In any event, that contention is without merit (see generally William Kaufman Org., 269 AD2d at 174). Present—Scudder, EJ., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Concord Associates, L.P. v. EPT Concord, LLC
101 A.D.3d 1574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
BURGDORF, JOSEPH D. v. KASPER, KENNETH G.
83 A.D.3d 1553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Salisbury v. Christian
68 A.D.3d 1664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.3d 1593, 879 N.Y.S.2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-buffalo-municipal-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2009.