Britt v. BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
This text of 106 S.E.2d 474 (Britt v. BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee’s briei states the question for decision as: “Does the Odum deed, which conveys the land in question, contain a condition subsequent that could defeat the title?”
The Odums are not parties to this action. They cannot be bound without an opportunity to be heard. No matter how laudable the purpose of the parties to this action, no judicial declaration should be made which could have no binding effect, but which might seriously cloud and interfere with such rights as the Odums may have. Adhering to our practice, Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co., 247 N.C. 666, 101 S.E. 2d 679; Edmondson v. Henderson, 246 N.C. 634, 99 S.E. 2d 869; Peel v. Moore, 244 N.C. 512, 94 S.E. 2d 491; Cutler v. Winfield, 241 N.C. 555, 85 S.E. 2d 913; Story v. Walcott, 240 N.C. 622, 83 S.E. 2d 498; Thomas v. Reavis, 196 N.C. 254, 145 S.E. 226, the judgment appealed from is vacated and the cause remanded to the Superior Court where additional parties necessary to a decision may be made.
Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.E.2d 474, 249 N.C. 409, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-baptist-childrens-homes-of-north-carolina-inc-nc-1959.