Brito v. State

696 So. 2d 546, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8172, 1997 WL 395234
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1877
StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 546 (Brito v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brito v. State, 696 So. 2d 546, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8172, 1997 WL 395234 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes error in the written sentence imposed on the appellant as to Count II, which charge was possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We therefore vacate said sentence as to Count II and return the matter to the trial court for resen-tencing. This should not require the attendance of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 546, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8172, 1997 WL 395234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brito-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.