Brito v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brito v. State

409 So. 2d 252, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29234

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brito v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1796 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1982·No. No. 82-91·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Senen Francisco Brito, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that, it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Senen Francisco Brito, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that, it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.

Brito v. State, 409 So. 2d 252, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29234 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

409 So. 2d 252 (Brito v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.