British Foreign Marine Ins. v. Board of Assessors

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

British Foreign Marine Ins. v. Board of Assessors

42 F. 90, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2119

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

DecidedApril 10, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 42 F. 90 (British Foreign Marine Ins. v. Board of Assessors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

British Foreign Marine Ins. v. Board of Assessors, 42 F. 90, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2119 (circtedla 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These suits are proceedings in equity, and submitted upon bill and affidavits for injunctions pendente lite. The complainants are foreign insurance companies, and have been taxed upon their gross receipts, estimated for the current year in advance by the assessors, and seek to enjoin the state officers and the officers of the city of New Orleans from collecting this tax. The statutes of the state on the subject are an act in relation to insurance companies, etc., No. 76 in the Acts of 1886, and the general annual revenue act No. 98 of the same year. Both these [91]*91acts were approved on tbe same day. The general revenue act was reenacted in 1888. The act in relation to insurance companies provides that the capital of the foreign insurance companies shall be determined and certified to by the secretary of state yearly, and shall be the aggregate value of the deposits made in this state and in the other states of the Union, as the security for the policy-holders, and bonds or mortgages upon real estate in the United States, with the proviso as follows: Provided “that said capital has not been taxed and paid by the main agency or company in any other state, then taxation shall be levied upon the gross receipts, less deductions governing companies organized under the laws of this state.” There is no other provision for taxing gross receipts. There is no method presented or indicated for ascertaining them. On the contrary, in the general revenue law, the valuations upon which taxes are to be assessed are required to be ascertained at the beginning of each year. In the general revenue law there is a most comprehensive enumeration of the things which shall be subject to taxation, but gross receipts are not mentioned, nor are they included in anything which is named. It is further to be observed that in the proviso, which contains the only authority lor taxing gross receipts, no rate of taxation is fixed, or authorized to be fixed. In the absence of any method, which the nature of the thing would require for ascertaining or approximating to the amount of gross receipts for an entire coming year, as well as in the absence of the establishment of any rate at which the amount, when reached, should be taxed, we are of the opinion that the gross receipts of the complainants cannot be deemed to have been subjected to any tax by the legislature, and therefore allow the injunctions pendente lite as prayed for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These suits are proceedings in equity, and submitted upon bill and affidavits for injunctions pendente lite. The complainants are foreign insurance companies, and have been taxed upon their gross receipts, estimated for the current year in advance by the assessors, and seek to enjoin the state officers and the officers of the city of New Orleans from collecting this tax. The statutes of the state on the subject are an act in relation to insurance companies, etc., No. 76 in the Acts of 1886, and the general annual revenue act No. 98 of the same year. Both these [91]*91acts were approved on tbe same day. The general revenue act was reenacted in 1888. The act in relation to insurance companies provides that the capital of the foreign insurance companies shall be determined and certified to by the secretary of state yearly, and shall be the aggregate value of the deposits made in this state and in the other states of the Union, as the security for the policy-holders, and bonds or mortgages upon real estate in the United States, with the proviso as follows: Provided “that said capital has not been taxed and paid by the main agency or company in any other state, then taxation shall be levied upon the gross receipts, less deductions governing companies organized under the laws of this state.” There is no other provision for taxing gross receipts. There is no method presented or indicated for ascertaining them. On the contrary, in the general revenue law, the valuations upon which taxes are to be assessed are required to be ascertained at the beginning of each year. In the general revenue law there is a most comprehensive enumeration of the things which shall be subject to taxation, but gross receipts are not mentioned, nor are they included in anything which is named. It is further to be observed that in the proviso, which contains the only authority lor taxing gross receipts, no rate of taxation is fixed, or authorized to be fixed. In the absence of any method, which the nature of the thing would require for ascertaining or approximating to the amount of gross receipts for an entire coming year, as well as in the absence of the establishment of any rate at which the amount, when reached, should be taxed, we are of the opinion that the gross receipts of the complainants cannot be deemed to have been subjected to any tax by the legislature, and therefore allow the injunctions pendente lite as prayed for.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 F. 90, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/british-foreign-marine-ins-v-board-of-assessors-circtedla-1890.