BRITISH D. MOSS v. State
This text of BRITISH D. MOSS v. State (BRITISH D. MOSS v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 21, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-617 Lower Tribunal No. F98-40785 ________________
British D. Moss, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.
British D. Moss, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011) (holding
that, under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the burden is on the
defendant to affirmatively identify those court records which, on their face,
demonstrate the existence of an illegal sentence or an entitlement to relief;
the State has no burden to establish the defendant is not entitled to relief);
Cox v. State, 221 So. 3d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (same). See also Burgess
v. State, 831 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 2002) (acknowledging that, as a general rule,
claims raised in a motion under rule 3.800(a) must be capable of resolution
as a matter of law, without an evidentiary determination, and on the face of
the existing court records).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BRITISH D. MOSS v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/british-d-moss-v-state-fladistctapp-2021.