Britany Lane f/k/a Brittany Hoyt v. Charles Hoyt
This text of Britany Lane f/k/a Brittany Hoyt v. Charles Hoyt (Britany Lane f/k/a Brittany Hoyt v. Charles Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-2082 _____________________________
BRITANY LANE f/k/a Brittany Hoyt,
Petitioner,
v.
CHARLES HOYT,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
August 1, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
WETHERELL and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur; BILBREY, J., concurs with opinion.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ BILBREY, J., concurring.
The motion to disqualify the trial judge raised sufficient grounds for disqualification but was untimely. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d)(1) & (e). I therefore concur in the denial of the petition for writ of prohibition. Of course, the trial judge retains “authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge’s own initiative.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i).
David A. Carroll, Pensacola, for Petitioner.
Caryn Van Matre, Pensacola, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Britany Lane f/k/a Brittany Hoyt v. Charles Hoyt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britany-lane-fka-brittany-hoyt-v-charles-hoyt-fladistctapp-2018.