Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line

34 F.2d 980, 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1548
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 F.2d 868
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 1, 1929·Published

Opinion

KNOX, District Judge.

It is my interpretation of the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, 31 F.(2d) 530, that it was intended that libelant’s damages should be the difference between the first contractual [981]*981obligation of tbe charterer, at the rate of hire therein specified, and the amount paid on the later charter over the period within whieh the vessel should not have been redelivered, viz., $1,747.89.

I likewise feel that the appellate court did not mean that the time consumed in fumigating the vessel should be at charterer’s expense. During that period she was, as it were, off hire. I have amended the within decree accordingly, and as amended have signed the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line, 34 F.2d 980, 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1548 (S.D.N.Y. 1929).

34 F.2d 980 (Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line
31 F.2d 530 (Second Circuit, 1929)