Bristow v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court

Bristow v. Thornton

437 P.2d 825, 249 Or. 294, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 646

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 437 P.2d 825 (Bristow v. Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bristow v. Thornton, 437 P.2d 825, 249 Or. 294, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 646 (Or. 1968).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, being dissatisfied with the ballot title prepared by the attorney general for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State, have appealed.

Their argument on appeal is that the title as prepared violates the spirit of OES 254.070.

We have carefully examined the ballot title prepared by the attorney general and are of the opinion that the title as prepared is in compliance with the statutes.

The attorney general’s ballot title is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI