Bristow v. Thornton
437 P.2d 825, 249 Or. 294, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 646
Opinions
The appellants, being dissatisfied with the ballot title prepared by the attorney general for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State, have appealed.
Their argument on appeal is that the title as prepared violates the spirit of OES 254.070.
We have carefully examined the ballot title prepared by the attorney general and are of the opinion that the title as prepared is in compliance with the statutes.
The attorney general’s ballot title is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bristow v. Thornton, 437 P.2d 825, 249 Or. 294, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 646 (Or. 1968).
437 P.2d 825 (Bristow v. Thornton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Redden v. Myers
513 P.2d 767 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1973)
OREGON AFL-CIO v. Weldon
473 P.2d 664 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1970)