Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas

719 N.E.2d 964, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3620
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 22, 1999
Docket99-1860
StatusPublished

This text of 719 N.E.2d 964 (Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 719 N.E.2d 964, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3620 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the answer of respondent,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, Cooic and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 N.E.2d 964, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bristow-v-crawford-cty-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-1999.