Bristow v. Bristow

159 So. 3d 961, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3591, 2015 WL 1071040
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 2015
DocketNo. 5D15-248
StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 3d 961 (Bristow v. Bristow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bristow v. Bristow, 159 So. 3d 961, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3591, 2015 WL 1071040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

EVANDER, J.

Appellant, Lonny Bristrow, appeals an order dismissing his petition for injunction for protection against domestic violence. Wé affirm because the petition failed to state a cause of action.1

Pursuant to section 741.30(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), any person who is either the victim of domestic violence or who has reasonable cause to believe he or she is in imminent danger of becoming a victim of any act of domestic violence has standing to file a sworn petition for an injunction for protection against domestic violence. In his petition, Appellant alleges that Appellee, his brother, made statements evincing an intent to physically harm Appellant. However, the allegations are extremely vague as to the circumstances surrounding the making of these alleged statements and, indeed, whether Appellee even made the statements to Appellant. As a result, the petition fails to allege facts that would support a finding [963]*963that Appellee has previously committed an act of domestic violence2 against him.

The petition also fails to allege sufficient facts to show that Appellant .has reasonable cause to believe he is in imminent danger of being a victim of domestic violence, particularly given the allegations that Appellant is currently incarcerated in Sumter County, Florida, and that Appellee is a resident of Ohio.

We further find no error in the trial court’s failure to set an evidentiary hearing. Because of the aforesaid pleading deficiencies, the petition fails to allege facts that would subject Appellee to the jurisdiction of this State’s courts under section 48.193, Florida Statutes (2014).

Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant filing, if able to do so in good faith, a new, legally sufficient petition.

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 So. 3d 961, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3591, 2015 WL 1071040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bristow-v-bristow-fladistctapp-2015.