Bristor v. Flaherty
30 Misc. 111, 61 N.Y.S. 872
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The defendant now objects, among other things, that the record is silent as to his residence within the jurisdiction of the trial court, and this is true. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Frees v. Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544.
Freedman, P. J., and Leventeitt, J., concur.
Judgment reversed .and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bristor v. Flaherty, 30 Misc. 111, 61 N.Y.S. 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).
30 Misc. 111 (Bristor v. Flaherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Cromey
176 Misc. 163 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1941)
Hill v. Moebus
30 Misc. 800 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Dugoff v. Zeman
63 N.Y.S. 1107 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)