Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Bristor v. Flaherty

Bristor v. Flaherty

30 Misc. 111, 61 N.Y.S. 872
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 30 Misc. 111 (Bristor v. Flaherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bristor v. Flaherty, 30 Misc. 111, 61 N.Y.S. 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

MacLean, J.

The defendant now objects, among other things, that the record is silent as to his residence within the jurisdiction of the trial court, and this is true. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Frees v. Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544.

Freedman, P. J., and Leventeitt, J., concur.

Judgment reversed .and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Cromey
176 Misc. 163 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1941)
Hill v. Moebus
30 Misc. 800 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Dugoff v. Zeman
63 N.Y.S. 1107 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 111, 61 N.Y.S. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bristor-v-flaherty-nyappterm-1899.