Bristol v. Northrup

42 A.D.2d 1027, 349 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3417
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law, without costs and application granted to invalidate and declare void respond-dent’s nominating petitions (see Matter of Goodman v. Board of Elections of City of N. T., 40 A D 2d 663, affd. 31 N Y 2d 763; Matter of Eaton v. Monahan, 72 Mise 2d 676). In passing we call to the attention of the Legislature the need to amend the form in subdivision 3 of section 138 of the Election Law to indicate clearly that the witness ” must not only be a “ qualified voter of the state ” but one who is also “ qualified to sign the petition.” (Order entered Oct. 17, 1973.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term, directing name to be placed on ballot.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Moule and Simons, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bristol v. Northrup, 42 A.D.2d 1027, 349 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

42 A.D.2d 1027 (Bristol v. Northrup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doran v. Scranton
49 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)