Bristol v. Kittinger

264 A.D. 808, 34 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810

This text of 264 A.D. 808 (Bristol v. Kittinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bristol v. Kittinger, 264 A.D. 808, 34 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of no cause of action in favor of the defendant in an action brought for the purchase price of goods, wares and merchandise and for services rendered. The evidence presented an issue of fact. Error was charged because defendant’s counsel asked a witness if he had been charged with grand larceny by the defendant and if he had been indicted by the grand jury. This was not reversible error. (People v. Milks, 70 App. Div. 438.) Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Milks
70 A.D. 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D. 808, 34 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bristol-v-kittinger-nyappdiv-1942.