Bristol v. Kittinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bristol v. Kittinger

264 A.D. 808, 34 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 1942·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of no cause of action in favor of the defendant in an action brought for the purchase price of goods, wares and merchandise and for services rendered. The evidence presented an issue of fact. Error was charged because defendant’s counsel asked a witness if he had been charged with grand larceny by the defendant and if he had been indicted by the grand jury. This was not reversible error. (People v. Milks, 70 App. Div. 438.) Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of no cause of action in favor of the defendant in an action brought for the purchase price of goods, wares and merchandise and for services rendered. The evidence presented an issue of fact. Error was charged because defendant’s counsel asked a witness if he had been charged with grand larceny by the defendant and if he had been indicted by the grand jury. This was not reversible error. (People v. Milks, 70 App. Div. 438.) Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Bristol v. Kittinger, 264 A.D. 808, 34 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 808 (Bristol v. Kittinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related