Bristol v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

133 A.D.2d 535, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50021
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this action for a declaratory judgment, it was error for the court to grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint without declaring the rights of the parties (Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334, cert denied 371 US 901). We therefore modify the order to make an appropriate declaration. Plaintiff is not a "retired employee” of defendant and thus is not entitled to travel pass benefits. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J. — declaratory judgment.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bristol v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 133 A.D.2d 535, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

133 A.D.2d 535 (Bristol v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzpatrick v. Rosenthal
29 A.D.3d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
AAC Contracting, Inc. v. United Coastal Insurance
193 A.D.2d 1085 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)