Bristol School Department v. State of Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights

114 R.I. 934
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided March 3, 1975·No. Appeal No. 74-306·Published

Opinion

Defendants are hereby ordered to show cause why the appeal in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed for this court’s lack of jurisdiction. Savings Bank of Newport v. Hawksley, 103 R. I. 741, 241 A.2d 806 (1968); Buffi v. Ferri, 106 R. I. 349, 259 A.2d 847; Clark v. Fascio, 106 R. I. 751, 264 A.2d 317 (1970). Defendants have twenty days from the date of this order to submit a memorandum in support of their appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bristol School Department v. State of Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights, 114 R.I. 934 (R.I. 1975).

114 R.I. 934 (Bristol School Department v. State of Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buffi v. Ferri
259 A.2d 847 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1969)
Clark v. Fascio
264 A.2d 317 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1970)
Savings Bank of Newport v. Hawksley
241 A.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1968)