Bristol Savings Bank v. Holley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Bristol Savings Bank v. Holley

58 A. 691, 77 Conn. 225, 1904 Conn. LEXIS 91

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedAugust 12, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 58 A. 691 (Bristol Savings Bank v. Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bristol Savings Bank v. Holley, 58 A. 691, 77 Conn. 225, 1904 Conn. LEXIS 91 (Colo. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Baldwin, J.

Shares in sundry corporations, standing in the name of George W. Mitchell, trustee under the will of Elisha N. Welch, were pledged to the plaintiff by James H. Welch, shortly before his death, to secure his notes, *226 under circumstances stated in the case of Freeman v. Bristol Savings Bank, 76 Conn. 212. The notes have been paid, by the application of part of the secuiities, and this suit is brought to -determine the title to the balance remaining in the hands of the pledgee.

James H. Welch had no legal title to what he pledged. At his death the beneficial interest in this property went, under the fifth codicil of his father’s will, to the residuary legatees, subject to the rights of the pledgee. The absolute gift made to James H. Welch by the original will was reduced to a life estate by the clear words of this codicil, notwithstanding the power given to the trustee to confide the trust funds to his possession and control. James H. Welch made these pledges under authority derived from the trustee, who had intrusted him with the stock certificates indorsed in blank. He received them into his custody as an agent for the trustee, and the rights of the plaintiff, under the circumstances, were the same as if the trustee had pledged them himself. Freeman v. Bristol Savings Bank, 76 Conn. 212, 218. Whatever agency was thus created ceased with the life of the agent. The trustee, as principal, had been at all times entitled to demand the stocks, on payment of the notes, and he only could demand them, or what remained of them, after the death of James H. Welch.

The answer of the trustee by way of interpleader disclaims any interest in the securities, and alleges that upon the death of James H. Welch he filed his final account as trustee under the will, of Elisha N. Welch in the Court of Probate for the district of Bristol; ' transferred the trust estate “ and any rights or rights of action in regard to said ‘estate, or pertaining to him as trustee, to the administrator with the will annexed of said estate; and was duly discharged as trustee by said Court of Probate.” No reply having been filed to this answer by any of the parties interpleading, it must be taken as true.

It follows that the administrator cum testamento annexo of the estate of Elisha N. Welch now holds whatever title to the pledged securities was formerly held by the trustee *227 for James H. Welch. As they formed part of the residuary estate of Elisha N. Welch, it would have been proper for the trustee, had he regained possession of them, to turn them over to the administrator, upon whom the duty of collecting and distributing that residue was cast by law. In lieu of this, he transferred his right of action in respect to them, and that is equally effectual to support the claim of the administrator against the bank. . The administration of a dead man’s estate is never complete until all the assets have been turned over to those rightfully entitled to them. Chamberlin’s Appeal, 70 Conn. 863, 376.

The Superior Court is advised to order the plaintiff to pay and transfer the property in question to the administrator cum testamento annexo of the estate of Elisha N. Welch, deceased.

No costs will be taxed in this court in favor of or against any of the parties.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J.

Shares in sundry corporations, standing in the name of George W. Mitchell, trustee under the will of Elisha N. Welch, were pledged to the plaintiff by James H. Welch, shortly before his death, to secure his notes, *226 under circumstances stated in the case of Freeman v. Bristol Savings Bank, 76 Conn. 212. The notes have been paid, by the application of part of the secuiities, and this suit is brought to -determine the title to the balance remaining in the hands of the pledgee.

James H. Welch had no legal title to what he pledged. At his death the beneficial interest in this property went, under the fifth codicil of his father’s will, to the residuary legatees, subject to the rights of the pledgee. The absolute gift made to James H. Welch by the original will was reduced to a life estate by the clear words of this codicil, notwithstanding the power given to the trustee to confide the trust funds to his possession and control. James H. Welch made these pledges under authority derived from the trustee, who had intrusted him with the stock certificates indorsed in blank. He received them into his custody as an agent for the trustee, and the rights of the plaintiff, under the circumstances, were the same as if the trustee had pledged them himself. Freeman v. Bristol Savings Bank, 76 Conn. 212, 218. Whatever agency was thus created ceased with the life of the agent. The trustee, as principal, had been at all times entitled to demand the stocks, on payment of the notes, and he only could demand them, or what remained of them, after the death of James H. Welch.

The answer of the trustee by way of interpleader disclaims any interest in the securities, and alleges that upon the death of James H. Welch he filed his final account as trustee under the will, of Elisha N. Welch in the Court of Probate for the district of Bristol; ' transferred the trust estate “ and any rights or rights of action in regard to said ‘estate, or pertaining to him as trustee, to the administrator with the will annexed of said estate; and was duly discharged as trustee by said Court of Probate.” No reply having been filed to this answer by any of the parties interpleading, it must be taken as true.

It follows that the administrator cum testamento annexo of the estate of Elisha N. Welch now holds whatever title to the pledged securities was formerly held by the trustee *227 for James H. Welch. As they formed part of the residuary estate of Elisha N. Welch, it would have been proper for the trustee, had he regained possession of them, to turn them over to the administrator, upon whom the duty of collecting and distributing that residue was cast by law. In lieu of this, he transferred his right of action in respect to them, and that is equally effectual to support the claim of the administrator against the bank. . The administration of a dead man’s estate is never complete until all the assets have been turned over to those rightfully entitled to them. Chamberlin’s Appeal, 70 Conn. 863, 376.

The Superior Court is advised to order the plaintiff to pay and transfer the property in question to the administrator cum testamento annexo of the estate of Elisha N. Welch, deceased.

No costs will be taxed in this court in favor of or against any of the parties.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A. 691, 77 Conn. 225, 1904 Conn. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bristol-savings-bank-v-holley-conn-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack