Bristol-Myers Co. v. Director

9 N.J. Tax 88
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided December 19, 1986·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Bristol-Myers appeals from two separate judgments of the Tax Court involving the Corporation Business Tax Act, N.J.S.A. 54:10A-1 et seq. The opinion of Judge Richard M. Conley dismissing the complaint involving the tax years of 1971 through 1975 because they were filed beyond the applicable time limitations is reported at 3 N.J.Tax 451 (Tax Ct.1981) and the opinion of Judge Michael A. Andrew, Jr., dismissing the complaint involving the tax years 1976 and 1977 on the basis that the Director had correctly determined the net worth of plaintiffs subsidiary investments under the act is reported at 8 N.J.Tax 133 (Tax Ct.1986).

[89]*89These judgments are affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the reported opinions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bristol-Myers Co. v. Director, 9 N.J. Tax 88 (N.J. Ct. App. 1986).

9 N.J. Tax 88 (Bristol-Myers Co. v. Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toys "R" Us, Inc. v. Director
692 A.2d 111 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Don Dan Construction Co. v. Director
14 N.J. Tax 569 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1995)
H.B. Acquisitions, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
12 N.J. Tax 60 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1991)
Centex Homes of New Jersey, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
10 N.J. Tax 473 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1989)