Bristol Iron & Steel Co. v. Selliez
34 A. 309, 175 Pa. 18, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1199
Opinion
The learned court was "clearly right in entering judgment against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. There is nothing in either of the assignments of error: that requires discussion. ,
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bristol Iron & Steel Co. v. Selliez, 34 A. 309, 175 Pa. 18, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1199 (Pa. 1896).
34 A. 309 (Bristol Iron & Steel Co. v. Selliez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Acetylene Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Smith
10 Pa. Super. 61 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Acetylene Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Beck
6 Pa. Super. 584 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)