Bristol City Lime Co. v. The Agnes Manning

59 F. 481, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 11, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 59 F. 481 (Bristol City Lime Co. v. The Agnes Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bristol City Lime Co. v. The Agnes Manning, 59 F. 481, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (E.D.N.Y. 1894).

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is an action brought in behalf of the owners, master, and crew of the steamship Exeter City to recover salvage compensation for services rendered the schooner Agnes Manning. In March, 1893, the steamship Exeter City, a merchant steamer bound to New York, when about 420 miles east of Sandy Hook, fell in with the schooner Agnes Manning, abandoned. The Manning was laden with a full cargo of coal, had been abandoned for about a week, was leaking, and when boarded had 10 or 11 feet of water in her hold. Previous to the abandonment, an effort had been made to tow the schooner by the steamship Nestoria. The effort, however, was given up after two hawsers had been broken. Thereupon the crew of the Manning left their vessel, and went on board of the Nestoria, which proceeded on her voyage. The Exeter City, about a week after, made fast to the Manning, put men on board of her, and, after six days’ towing, brought her into the port of New York in safety. The appraised value of the Manning is $27,-000, and her cargo $2,000. The service was performed at an expense to the owners of the Exeter City of $850. The remarks of this court made in deciding the case of The Anna, 6 Ben. 1GG, Fed. Cas. No. 398, more than 20 years ago, where it is said: “For the taking in charge and saving of a wreck so situated the reward should be such as to insure at all times the rendering of any amount of labor, the incurring of any risk, and the deviation by any vessel from any voyage, in order to supply the wreck with a crew, and make her presence safe,” may be repeated here.

The libelants are entitled to a liberal salvage compensation for the services rendered. The only question is what would be a liberal compensation. It is claimed on behalf of the libelants that the amount awarded should very much exceed the average amount heretofore given in cases of derelict, it being now apparent that the rewards given are not sufficient to induce vessels to incur the hazard of towing a wreck, so that commerce is impaired by the number of floating wrecks left abandoned, and the government itself lias felt it its duty to send national vessels out in order to destroy these obstructions to navigation. This consideration is not without weight in determining the amount of salvage in a case like this. In niy opinion, 50 per cent, of the value of the property saved will be a liberal reward, deducting first the sum of $850, expended by the salvors, which sum is to be first paid to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westar Marine Services v. Heerema Marine Contractors
621 F. Supp. 1135 (N.D. California, 1985)
Tidewater Salvage, Inc. v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
633 F.2d 1304 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Tracor Marine Inc. v. M/V MARGOTH
403 F. Supp. 392 (District Court, Canal Zone, 1975)
The Henry R. Tilton
214 F. 165 (D. Massachusetts, 1913)
The Myrtle Tunnel
146 F. 324 (D. South Carolina, 1906)
The Theta
135 F. 129 (S.D. New York, 1905)
Law
122 F. 816 (D. Maine, 1903)
The Cayenne
5 F. Cas. 322 (D. Delaware, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F. 481, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bristol-city-lime-co-v-the-agnes-manning-nyed-1894.