Brista v. State
This text of 191 S.W. 7 (Brista v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts). The wilful, deliberate, malicious and premeditated shooting and breaking into the house, under the circumstances shown, resulting in the killing of Sweetie Stacher, as charged in the indictment, constituted murder instead of manslaughter. The jury having accepted the testimony on behalf of the State tending to* show that appellant was one of the parties who did the shooting, should have returned a verdict against him for murder instead of manslaughter. Even if appellant did not fire the fatal shot, the undisputed evidence shows that he was present, aiding, abetting and assisting in the wicked and malignant acts of lawlessness which resulted in the death of this little girl. He was, therefore, guilty, according to his own testimony and the undisputed evidence, of murder instead of manslaughter.
There are no prejudicial errors in the record and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 S.W. 7, 126 Ark. 565, 1917 Ark. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brista-v-state-ark-1917.