Brissett v. Craven County

594 F. App'x 198
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. 14-2094·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Courtnay T. and Ladwin Brissett appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brissett v. Craven Cnty., No. 4:14-cv-00179-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2014). • We deny the Brissetts’ motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brissett v. Craven County, 594 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2015).

594 F. App'x 198 (Brissett v. Craven County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)