Brison v. Marsolais

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 7, 1993·No. 93-1119·Unpublished

Opinion

July 7, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 93-1119

RAYMOND A. BRISON,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

MARSOLAIS, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Raymond A. Brison on brief pro se.

Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the

appellant's brief and the record on appeal. We agree with

the district court's conclusion that appellant's complaint is

barred by Massachusetts' three-year statute of limitations on

personal injury actions, Mass. Gen. L. ch. 260, 2A, which

is applicable to civil rights complaints, filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. 1983. Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989); see

also Street v. Vose, 936 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1991), cert.

denied, 112 S. Ct. 948 (1992). There is nothing in the

record to suggest that that limitations period was, or ought

to have been, tolled. The order of the district court

dismissing the complaint is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brison v. Marsolais, (1st Cir. 1993).

Brison v. Marsolais (Brison v. Marsolais) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. Okure
488 U.S. 235 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Richard A. Street v. George Vose, Etc.
936 F.2d 38 (First Circuit, 1991)