Briskin v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Briskin v. Chemical Bank

49 A.D.2d 872, 373 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11069

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 872 (Briskin v. Chemical Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Briskin v. Chemical Bank, 49 A.D.2d 872, 373 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a sum of money, in which plaintiff was granted summary judgment by order of the District Court, Nassau County, Second District, Wantaugh Part, dated June 4, 1974, defendant appeals (by permission) and as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated December 12, 1974, as, upon reversing the order of the District Court and denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, did not grant it (defendant) summary judgment. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. There are issues of fact which require a trial. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a sum of money, in which plaintiff was granted summary judgment by order of the District Court, Nassau County, Second District, Wantaugh Part, dated June 4, 1974, defendant appeals (by permission) and as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated December 12, 1974, as, upon reversing the order of the District Court and denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, did not grant it (defendant) summary judgment. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. There are issues of fact which require a trial. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 872, 373 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briskin-v-chemical-bank-nyappdiv-1975.