Briseno Godinez v. Holder
This text of 375 F. App'x 720 (Briseno Godinez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Victor Manuel Briseno Godinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturnbama v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.
*721 The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied Briseno Godinez’s motion to reopen because he failed to voluntarily depart during his voluntary departure period, and is therefore ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(l); cf. Matter of Zmijewska, 24 I. & N. Dec. 87, 94 (BIA 2007).
We need not address Briseno Godinez’s remaining contentions, as they are foreclosed by his ineligibility for relief.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 F. App'x 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briseno-godinez-v-holder-ca9-2010.