Brisendine v. Brisendine

111 S.E. 22, 152 Ga. 745, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 268
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 18, 1922
DocketNo. 2492
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 22 (Brisendine v. Brisendine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brisendine v. Brisendine, 111 S.E. 22, 152 Ga. 745, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 268 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

1. There was no effort to assign error in the bill of exceptions on any judgment other than one rendered November 5, 1920, awarding the wife temporary alimony and counsel fees in the proceeding under the Civil Code, § 2986. The judge certified that the bill of exceptions was tendered to him on November 25, 1920, and for providential reasons not certified until January 28, 1921. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the writ of error is without merit.

2. A wife sued for divorce on the ground of cruel treatment, and in the petition prayed for an allowance of counsel fees, and for permanent [746]*746and temporary alimony for lierself and minor daughter. On a hearing counsel fees and temporary alimony were allowed pending the action. On the trial of the suit for divorce there was a verdict that the wife was not entitled to a divorce, and a decree was entered in accordance with the verdict. Subsequently, and while no suit for divorce was pending, the wife instituted a proceeding under the Civil Code (1910), § 2986, for permanent and temporary alimony for herself, and an allowance for counsel fees, alleging that she and her husband w'ere living in a bona fide state of separation caused by his cruel treatment towards her — the acts of cruelty alleged being the same as those set forth in her petition as grounds "for divorce. On a preliminary hearing she was allowed temporary alimony and counsel fees. Meld:

No. 2492. February 18, 1922. Alimony, etc. Before Judge George L. Bell. Fulton superior court. November 5, 1920. T. G. Battle and W. I. Heyward, for plaintiff in error. James & Bedgood, contra.

(а) The award of temporary alimony to the wife for herself and minor daughter pending her suit for divorce terminated with the conclusion of that action against her. Bishop v. Bishop, 124 Ga. 293 (52 S. E. 743); Mason v. Mason, 151 Ga. 468 (107 S. E. 331).

(б) The verdict and decree against the wife in the suit for divorce was no bar to the allowance of alimony to her in the statutory proceeding. King v. King, 151 Ga. 361 (106 S. E. 906.)

3. Alimony will not be allowed to a wife who abandons her husband without just cause. Fuller v. Fuller, 108 Ga. 256 (33 S. E. 865).

(a) This is a proceeding under the Civil Code (1910), § 2986, for the allowance of alimony and counsel fees, where the husband and wife are living in a bona fide state of separation. On the hearing the testimony of the wife clearly showed that she voluntarily abandoned her husband without just cause. It was therefore an abuse of discretion to allow her alimony and counsel fees. Davis v. Davis, 145 Ga. 56 (88 S. E. 566).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Brown
124 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Davenport v. Davenport
82 S.E.2d 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Acree v. Acree
40 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Mullikin v. Mullikin
38 S.E.2d 281 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Camp v. Camp
33 S.E.2d 445 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Williams v. Williams
21 S.E.2d 229 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Davis v. Davis
111 P.2d 124 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1941)
Long v. Long
13 S.E.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Hudson v. Hudson
5 S.E.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Bulloch v. Bulloch
4 S.E.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Fulenwider v. Fulenwider
5 S.E.2d 20 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Tillman v. Tillman
1 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Hunsicker v. Hunsicker
152 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Duss v. Duss
111 So. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
McCallum v. McCallum
122 S.E. 231 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Perkerson v. Perkerson
122 S.E. 53 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Pace v. Pace
115 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 22, 152 Ga. 745, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brisendine-v-brisendine-ga-1922.