Briscoe v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Briscoe v. State

882 S.W.2d 235, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 994, 1994 WL 270467

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1994·No. Nos. 64274, 64350·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kenneth Briscoe, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kenneth Briscoe, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Briscoe v. State, 882 S.W.2d 235, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 994, 1994 WL 270467 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

882 S.W.2d 235 (Briscoe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.