Briscoe v. Mohr
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ------------------------------------------------------------------ ELVERT S. BRISCOE, JR., : : Case No. 1:18-cv-02417 Plaintiff, : : vs. : : OPINION & ORDER GARY MOHR, ODRC DIRECTOR, , : [Resolving Doc. 19] Defendant. : : ------------------------------------------------------------------
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Plaintiff Elvert S. Briscoe, Jr., an Ohio inmate, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On March 8, 2019, the Court screened and dismissed Plaintiff’s case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).2 Plaintiff appealed.3 On April 7, 2020, the Sixth Circuit issued a mandate, affirming the Court's dismissal of some claims and vacating the Court's dismissal of other claims.4 On May 12, 2020, the Sixth Circuit recalled the mandate because Plaintiff filed a petition for a rehearing .5 On May 29, 2020, Plaintiff moved to compel the Ohio Attorney General and the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction Director to provide forwarding addresses for Defendants Gary Mohr and Lashann Eppinger.6 The Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on Plaintiff’s motion to compel because the Sixth Circuit recalled its mandate.7 The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to compel for lack of jurisdiction.
1 Doc. 1. 2 Doc. 5. 3 Doc. 7. 4 Doc. 12. 5 Doc. 16. 6 Doc. 19. 7 , 933 F.3d 614, 615 (6th Cir. 2019) (“Subject to very few exceptions, the filing of a notice of appeal shifts from the district court to the court of appeals adjudicatory authority over any IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 17, 2020 JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Briscoe v. Mohr (Briscoe v. Mohr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.