Briscoe v. Clarke
1 Va. 213, 1 Rand. 213
Opinion
November 27.
delivered tlie opinion of the court.
[219] The court is of opinion, that on the matter stated in the third bill of exceptions, the superior court erred in setting aside the verdict, and granting a new trial. Without no- . ticing any other objection, the court affirms the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Briscoe v. Clarke, 1 Va. 213, 1 Rand. 213 (Va. 1822).
1 Va. 213 (Briscoe v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beverlin v. Casto
57 S.E. 411 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1907)
Milburn v. Phillips
34 N.E. 983 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Johnson v. McClung
26 W. Va. 659 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
Platt v. Schreyer
25 F. 83 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1885)
Livesay's Ex'r v. Beard
22 W. Va. 585 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)
Harden v. Wagner
22 W. Va. 356 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)
Tompkins' Ex'r v. Stephens
10 W. Va. 156 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1877)
Tyler v. Taylor
21 Va. 700 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1872)
Cochran v. Paris
11 Gratt. 348 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1854)
Beall v. Williamson
14 Ala. 55 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1848)
Fauntleroy's Heirs v. Dunn
42 Ky. 594 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1843)
Pleasants v. Clements
2 Va. 474 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1831)