Brisco v. State

1912 OK CR 211, 124 P. 626, 7 Okla. Crim. 517, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 213
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 15, 1912·No. No A-1159·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

The plaintiff in error, William Brisco, •was .convicted in the district court of Bryan county at the Jan *518 uary, 1911, term, on a charge of murder and convicted of manslaughter. His punishment was fixed by the court at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of ten years.

The homicide out of which this charge grew occurred at a negro picnic in the farmhouse of a negro named Shelton. The-accused is a white man, and deceased, Albert Simon, a full-blood Choctaw.

The material portions of the testimony introduced on behalf of the state at the trial are as follows: The deceased and one-Sam Billy had gone to the picnic in a buggy belonging to deceased. At about 11 o’clock accused arrived at the picnic grounds and went up to the buggy. The accused and deceased then went south from the picnic grounds and were gone about half an hour, when they returned to the picnic grounds. Thereafter accused, the deceased, and Sam Billy went to the accused’s house. The purpose of going to accused’s is thus stated by Sam Billy:

“Q. How did you three go to Brisco’s house? A. Well, Simon-and Brisco said to me to drive this buggy for them. I told them all right. I did. Q. What did you go to Brisco’s house for? A. He said, ‘Go down there’ —• Q. Who said? A. Brisco said, ‘Got some chock over there.’ He wanted us to go down there and get it. Q. For what ? A. He said he wanted us to go down there to get this beer for that night- — picnic night. Q. Wanted to get this beer for that picnic night? A. Yes, sir. Q. What to do with? A. He said going to sell him. * * * Q. When you got to Brisco’s house what did' you do? A. I stayed in the buggy. Q. What did the others do? A. Went in the yard. Q. Flow long did they stay? A. Didn’t stay no time. Q. What did they do there? A. They went and got the chock — -jug of beer. Q. How many jugs did they get? A. Got a couple of jugs. Q. What did they do with the jugs? A. Brought them in the buggy. *• * * Q. When they got back in the buggy where did you then go ? A. I turned around to-go back to the picnic grounds, towards in that way. Q. Did you stop any place? A. No, sir. Q. Where did you get out of the buggy? A. We got out of the buggy at fellow named Shelton’s house. * * * Q. Going up there to Shelton’s house from Brisco’s house tell the first that took place between this defendant and Simon. A. They had a talk, but I didn’t pay any attention; they had a little cutting up between them. Q. What was ‘cutting up’? A. These two parties; *519 Brisco says he has some Choctaw beer. If any officer came over ■after this beer going to hurt him, and Simon told him no he wouldn’t. He says, ‘If McPherson a little officer come over there, he was going to shoot his brains out.’ Q. That is what Brisco said? A. Yes. Q. What did ,Simon say? A. He says, ‘You can’t do it.’ Q. What was said about money, if anything? A. No, sir. Didn’t say anything about money. I think not. But was something about money when we came back. Q. What did he say coming back ? A. Pie says he got big pile of money. Q. What did Simon say? A. He want his money. Q. What did Simon say to Brisco about his money? A. lie says he owe him $2.50, I believe. I don’t know. Q. Simon told him that? A. Yes. Q. What did Brisco say? A. He says he has big pile of money in his pocket right then. Wasn’t going to pay him right then. Q. What else was said? A. Didn’t say nothing. That is all he said. Q. What— Then when he drove up there to Shelton’s house what did they do when they got there? A. He was drinking pretty sharp as we come up. Q. Who was drinking? A. Three of us. Q. What were you drinking? A. Choctaw beer. Q. That is what you call it? A. That is what it was. Q. Where did you get it ? A. Brisco .gave it to us.”

When they arrived at Shelton’s, Brisco told them to carry the beer into the house.

There was only one witness who heard and saw what was :said and done by the parties in the difficulty which resulted in the fatal shooting. This person was George Rogers, a witness for the •state. After testifying that he saw the three persons come up in the buggy and as to what they did, witness Rogers testified:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brisco v. State, 1912 OK CR 211, 124 P. 626, 7 Okla. Crim. 517, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 213 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

1912 OK CR 211 (Brisco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Shafer
1919 OK CR 112 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1919)
Bucher v. Showalter
1913 OK 527 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Ostendorf v. State
1912 OK CR 411 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1912)