Brisban v. Hoyt

1 Wend. 27
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1828
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wend. 27 (Brisban v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brisban v. Hoyt, 1 Wend. 27 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, C. J.

The motion is denied, with costs. Where the effect of a rule granting a commission is to stay the proceedings, the affidavit must state the party has a defence on the merits. (2 Johns. Cas. 285.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franklin v. United Insurance
2 Johns. Cas. 285 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wend. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brisban-v-hoyt-nysupct-1828.